Families' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Degradation Endangering Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Seeking Answers and Clarity
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.